

Since the online public meeting on Wednesday 31 January and subsequent public meeting on Monday 5 February, what changes have you made?
We have:
- Delayed the start of the works in Foxton to further review the plans following feedback. We are looking to start works in the spring.
- Restarted work to look at creating a separate footpath on Shepreth Road. This will not form part of the early works, but we are committed to improve Shepreth Road as part of the Melbourn Greenway.
- Reconfirmed our commitment to the route over the A10 level crossing as part of the later phase of works to be completed in 2025.
- Removed our proposals to create a short section of diagonal footpath following a ‘desire line’ on Challis Close.
- Moved speed humps placed in front of driveways or near to sensitive listed buildings.
- Replaced the priority chicane measure on the High Street with a speed hump.
- Relocated the speed hump between The Green and Caxton Lane to avoid resident’s access.
- Increased the amount of footway (pavement) space at the junction of West Hill Road to maintain the rose bushes.
- Reduced the size of the raised crossing area at the junction of Caxton Lane and The Green to reduce the impact on greenery.
- Committed to work with Cambridgeshire County Council to implement a 20mph zone on Fowlmere Road – likely to be delivered as part of the phase 2 works.
Improvements and changes to the scheme
Need for improvements to Shepreth Road
|
|
Concerns about speedbump placement in front of driveways |
Where possible, speed humps have been relocated |
Suggestion for inclusion of automatic speed reminder sign |
This is not included in the scheme |
Need for speed reduction measures on Fowlmere Rd or 20mph Zone |
This is being reviewed for delivery as phase 2 works with Cambridgeshire County Council |
Need for improvements for Foxton level crossing |
The Melbourn Greenway will include improvements to the Foxton level crossing for walking and cycling. This is part of the second phase of works. The designs need to be reworked due to Foxton travel hub plans being paused. They also need to go through further checks with Network Rail as we are building near a busy railway. |
Request for traffic-calming measures in Barrington Road |
Not included in the phase 1 scheme but may be included in the works to the A10 level crossing as part of phase 2 |
Request for traffic-calming measures in Chalk Hill |
Not included in phase 1 scheme. A 20mph zone will be considered for delivery as a phase 2 scheme |
Specific changes
Concern over the location of double-yellow lines |
|
Need for a traffic-light-controlled crossing at the A10 |
|
Concern over the proximity of speed hump on Station Road being too close to grade 2 listed property |
With regard to potential damage to buildings it is very unlikely that even superficial damage could be caused by the installation of humps and cushions [1] |
Concern of raised table crossing being too far north on Station Road |
This crossing will remain in place and forms part of a key route to the high school and railway station. |
Concern over removal of widened footway at Challis Close Corner |
We will not remove the recently widened footway |
Concern over the impact of the scheme on floral tribute |
There will be no impact on the floral tribute, as the path widening has been removed from our proposals. |
Concern over low drain on corner of Station Road |
Drainage issues have been accounted for |
Concern over flooding experienced around the parish green near to The Green |
Drainage issues have been accounted for |
[1] Transport Research Laboratory (1999) traffic calming: vehicle generated noise and ground-borne vibration alongside sinusoidal, round-top and flat-top road humps
Overall concerns
Concern over plans not considering other projects taking place at the village |
Detailed discussions have taken place with Cambridgeshire County Council’s street works team (who licence and coordinate road work permits) and with the Burlington Press developers to coordinate our activities |
Concern over the project’s impact on the character of the village |
|
Concern over agricultural vehicles navigating the village |
Engineers have reviewed the designs against turning movements of large vehicles and agricultural traffic |
Concern over the maintenance of the roads |
Funding has been set aside for the maintenance of the greenway schemes by Cambridgeshire County Council |
Concern about increased noise and air pollution from speed humps |
|
Request for clarification over the necessity of traffic calming features |
|
Request for clarification over the budget of the project | The scheme is being paid from city deal funding, which was awarded to the Greater Cambridge Partnership to better balance and support our region’s growth |
Other comments
Requests for clarification of the consultation process |
Designed to extend opportunities for people to walk, wheel or cycle, more safely and easily, the scheme has been developed to support the objectives in the Foxton neighbourhood plan (2021) and is based on feedback gathered from residents in three previous rounds of consultation/engagement (2017-18, 2019 and 2022). A copy of the Foxton neighbourhood plan is available here: Foxton Neighbourhood Plan In addition, we have run three previous rounds of engagement on the project:
|
Request for more consultation with residents |
|
Contact information for raising issues. |
Email contactus@greatercambridge.org.uk or phone 01223 699906 |
Request for clarification on consultation with all statutory consultees |
All statutory consultees were consulted during the original consultation period. We are engaging the emergency services before advertising the traffic order and the designs have been through two independent road safety audits. |
Need to engage more with schools/children/parents/carers |
|
Too much reliance on digital communications |
|
Requests for clarification over the need for an embargo of the early works plan |
We can only publish and make public a design when it is finalised. Before this we seek feedback on our designs from local councillors, parish councils and other stakeholders as representatives of a particular community, or user groups
|
Background info
Purpose of the project |
|
Request for sharing traffic data – speeds, volume, accidents |
|
Request for statistics regarding cyclists using the route |
|
Request for clarification on the decision-making process |
Formal decisions were taken by the Greater Cambridge Partnership’s executive board in:
|
How to proceed with daily activities during construction |
|
Requests for fact sheets about the project |
All the information about the project can be found on the Melbourn Greenway page |
The GCP does not seem to have followed the statutory requirement in the Highways Act 1980 90(c) 2 and issued the required notification of the proposals on site as well as the 21-day consultation |
Cambridgeshire County Council will advertise a traffic regulation order in due course, for which anyone can make a representation within 21 days of the notice being published. This will be promoted locally by the county council |